<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Indiana Criminal Law &#187; Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.incrimlaw.org/category/research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.incrimlaw.org</link>
	<description>Created &#38; maintained by Youngcourt Law Office, Huron, Indiana.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:24:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Enhancement of multiple counts with same weapon inappropriate</title>
		<link>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2008/11/20/98/enhancement-of-multiple-counts-with-same-weapon-inappropriate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2008/11/20/98/enhancement-of-multiple-counts-with-same-weapon-inappropriate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incrimlaw.org/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following post is from Andy Krull of the Indiana Public Defender Council in response to a double jeopardy inquiry.
TITLE:  Miller v. State
CITE:   (6-25-03), Ind., 790/437
SUBJECT:  Double jeopardy &#8211; repeated use of single weapon to enhance several convictions
HOLDING:  Ct. has recognized a series of statutory construction &#38; common law that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2008/11/20/98/enhancement-of-multiple-counts-with-same-weapon-inappropriate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Put the Judge on Notice of CR4 Problems</title>
		<link>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2008/11/20/96/put-the-judge-on-notice-of-cr4-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2008/11/20/96/put-the-judge-on-notice-of-cr4-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incrimlaw.org/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following post is from Stacy Uliana of the Indiana Public Defender Council in response to a Criminal Rule 4 question.
TITLE: Chambers v. State
CITE: (4th Dist.; 05-3-06), Ind.App., 848/298
SUBJECT: Word &#8220;objection&#8221; not required to preserve issue for appeal
HOLDING: Although defense counsel did not use the word &#8220;objection&#8221; when the State requested a continuance of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2008/11/20/96/put-the-judge-on-notice-of-cr4-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

