<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Indiana Criminal Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.incrimlaw.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.incrimlaw.org</link>
	<description>Created &#38; maintained by Youngcourt Law Office, Huron, Indiana.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:24:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Traffic stop based on random license plate check</title>
		<link>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1125/traffic-stop-based-on-random-license-plate-check-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1125/traffic-stop-based-on-random-license-plate-check-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indiana Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incrimlaw.org/?p=1125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Armfield v. State, 29S02-0811-CR-590
12-18-09, Ind.
Attorney: Taffanee Keys
Holding:          Trial court properly denied the Defendant&#8217;s motion to suppress. Resolving a split in the appellate courts, Court held that an officer has reasonable suspicion to initiate a Terry stop when: (1) the officer knows that the registered owner of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1125/traffic-stop-based-on-random-license-plate-check-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Traffic stop based on random license plate check</title>
		<link>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1122/traffic-stop-based-on-random-license-plate-check/</link>
		<comments>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1122/traffic-stop-based-on-random-license-plate-check/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indiana Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incrimlaw.org/?p=1122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Holly v. State, 49S01-0811-CR-591
12-18-09, Ind.
Attorney: Timothy Burns
Holding:          Trial court erred by denying Defendant&#8217;s motion to suppress.  An officer has reasonable suspicion to initiate a Terry stop when: (1) the officer knows that the registered owner of a vehicle has a suspended license and (2) the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1122/traffic-stop-based-on-random-license-plate-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD) &#8211; D&#8217;s failure to deliver request to Tr.Ct. and prosecutor</title>
		<link>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1119/interstate-agreement-on-detainers-iad-ds-failure-to-deliver-request-to-tr-ct-and-prosecutor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1119/interstate-agreement-on-detainers-iad-ds-failure-to-deliver-request-to-tr-ct-and-prosecutor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indiana Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incrimlaw.org/?p=1119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bowling v. State, 68A05-0906-CR-306
5th Dist., 12-30-09, Ind.App.
Attorney: Dale W. Arnett
Holding:          Under the IAD, a defendant must be brought to trial within 180 days after he has “caused to be delivered” to the prosecutor and the appropriate court written notice of where he is incarcerated and of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1119/interstate-agreement-on-detainers-iad-ds-failure-to-deliver-request-to-tr-ct-and-prosecutor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prior rape conviction inadmissible under intent exception to Ind. Evid.R. 404(b)</title>
		<link>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1114/prior-rape-conviction-inadmissible-under-intent-exception-to-ind-evid-r-404b/</link>
		<comments>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1114/prior-rape-conviction-inadmissible-under-intent-exception-to-ind-evid-r-404b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indiana Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incrimlaw.org/?p=1114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lafayette v. State, 45S03-0904-CR-182
12-08-09, Ind.
Attorney: Mark A. Bates
Holding:          In rape prosecution, trial court erred in admitting testimony about Defendant’s prior attempted rape conviction under the intent exception to Ind. Evidence Rule 404(b), because Defendant did not present a claim of particular contrary intent by claiming intercourse [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1114/prior-rape-conviction-inadmissible-under-intent-exception-to-ind-evid-r-404b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entering controlled area of airport with weapon &#8211; insufficient evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1111/entering-controlled-area-of-airport-with-weapon-insufficient-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1111/entering-controlled-area-of-airport-with-weapon-insufficient-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indiana Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incrimlaw.org/?p=1111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kribs v. State, 49A05-0904-CR-225
5th Dist., 12-14-09, Ind.App.
Attorney: Joel M. Schumm
Holding:          State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Defendant knowingly or intentionally entered a controlled area of an airport with a weapon or explosive, in violation of I.C. 35-47-6-1.3.  Following bench trial that resulted [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1111/entering-controlled-area-of-airport-with-weapon-insufficient-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Operating vehicle with suspended license &#8211; motor scooter</title>
		<link>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1108/operating-vehicle-with-suspended-license-motor-scooter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1108/operating-vehicle-with-suspended-license-motor-scooter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indiana Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incrimlaw.org/?p=1108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Annis v. State, 76A03-0908-CR-369
3rd Dist., 12-09-09, Ind.App.
Attorney: John Pinnow
Holding:          For purposes of I.C. 9-30-10, a motor vehicle is a vehicle that is self-propelled but the definition does not include a motorized bicycle.  I.C. 9-13-2-105(d).  A motorized bicycle is defined as a vehicle with two [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1108/operating-vehicle-with-suspended-license-motor-scooter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Operating while intoxicated (OWI) &#8211; proof of endangerment required</title>
		<link>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1105/operating-while-intoxicated-owi-proof-of-endangerment-required/</link>
		<comments>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1105/operating-while-intoxicated-owi-proof-of-endangerment-required/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indiana Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incrimlaw.org/?p=1105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outlaw v. State, 49A02-0904-CR-340
2nd Dist., 12-18-09, Ind.App.
Attorney: Barbara J. Simmons
Holding:          State is required to submit proof of &#8220;endangerment&#8221; that goes beyond mere intoxication to obtain a conviction for Class A misdemeanor OWI.  I.C. 9-30-5-2(b) requires State to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Defendant &#8220;operate[d] [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1105/operating-while-intoxicated-owi-proof-of-endangerment-required/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obstruction of justice &#8211; sufficient evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1102/obstruction-of-justice-sufficient-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1102/obstruction-of-justice-sufficient-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indiana Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incrimlaw.org/?p=1102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Howell v. State, 49A04-0903-CR-172
4th Dist., 12-09-09, Ind.App.
Attorney: Robert D. King, Jr.
Holding:          Evidence was sufficient to support Defendant&#8217;s conviction for obstruction of justice even though the email messages that constituted “false records” for the basis of the charge did not contain false or inaccurate information.  I.C. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1102/obstruction-of-justice-sufficient-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Child seduction &#8211; sufficient evidence D was &#8220;custodian&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1099/child-seduction-sufficient-evidence-d-was-custodian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1099/child-seduction-sufficient-evidence-d-was-custodian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indiana Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incrimlaw.org/?p=1099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gellenbeck v. State, 79A02-0903-CR-253
2nd Dist., 12-30-09, Ind.App.
Attorney: Bruce W. Graham
Holding:          State presented sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude that Defendant was complaining witness&#8217;s (CW&#8217;s) custodian for purposes of child seduction statute.  As used in I.C. 35-42-4-7, &#8220;custodian&#8221; means any person who resides with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1099/child-seduction-sufficient-evidence-d-was-custodian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D required to register as sex offender for 1984 Arizona conviction</title>
		<link>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1096/d-required-to-register-as-sex-offender-for-1984-arizona-conviction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1096/d-required-to-register-as-sex-offender-for-1984-arizona-conviction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Indiana Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incrimlaw.org/?p=1096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Herron v. State, 55A05-0906-CV-341
5th Dist., 12-29-09, Ind.App.
Attorney: Steven C. Litz
Holding:          Defendant, who was required by Arizona to register as a sex offender for life when he committed his offense in 1983, is a &#8220;sex offender&#8221; who is required to register for life under Indiana&#8217;s Sex Offender [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.incrimlaw.org/2010/03/01/1096/d-required-to-register-as-sex-offender-for-1984-arizona-conviction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
